<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Qlik Acquired By Thoma Bravo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Dark		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38175&quot;&gt;Neil Gulliver&lt;/a&gt;.

Hopefully there will be more focus on talking to users about what they want and need.  Many of the acquisitions have been sound - DataMarket for example is a good example where it complements the Qlik portfolio.  They don&#039;t seem to have engaged with users fully about how they then use this acquisition - presently you have to subscribe to a whole tranche of their data in order to be able to use any of it.  A sweetshop approach where you can pick-and-mix your data would appear to me to be more what is required.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38175">Neil Gulliver</a>.</p>
<p>Hopefully there will be more focus on talking to users about what they want and need.  Many of the acquisitions have been sound &#8211; DataMarket for example is a good example where it complements the Qlik portfolio.  They don&#8217;t seem to have engaged with users fully about how they then use this acquisition &#8211; presently you have to subscribe to a whole tranche of their data in order to be able to use any of it.  A sweetshop approach where you can pick-and-mix your data would appear to me to be more what is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neil Gulliver		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Gulliver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 12:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, Steve.
Typically, there will be some restructuring as is the case for so many consequences of a takeover. I suspect there will be a focus on how Qlik has purchased and integrated products in the past and what products are financially viable as this does appear to be a weakness going back as far as Qlik&#039;s acquisition of Expressor. The Sales and Marketing that Barry touches on in his article are often playing catch-up trying to work out how to sell a product long after it&#039;s acquisition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Steve.<br />
Typically, there will be some restructuring as is the case for so many consequences of a takeover. I suspect there will be a focus on how Qlik has purchased and integrated products in the past and what products are financially viable as this does appear to be a weakness going back as far as Qlik&#8217;s acquisition of Expressor. The Sales and Marketing that Barry touches on in his article are often playing catch-up trying to work out how to sell a product long after it&#8217;s acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Dark		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 14:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38084&quot;&gt;Cotiso Hanganu&lt;/a&gt;.

That is a tough call.  As someone that came from a Microsoft background (.Net, SQL Server, ASP) I would hate to have to go back that way - but Power BI does seem to be getting some development behind it.  I would have to take a fair bit of time to regroup, but I would probably look to be platform agnostic and really focus on content and design rather than platform.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38084">Cotiso Hanganu</a>.</p>
<p>That is a tough call.  As someone that came from a Microsoft background (.Net, SQL Server, ASP) I would hate to have to go back that way &#8211; but Power BI does seem to be getting some development behind it.  I would have to take a fair bit of time to regroup, but I would probably look to be platform agnostic and really focus on content and design rather than platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotiso Hanganu		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotiso Hanganu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 06:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hoping for the best and preparing for the worst… What do you consider could be your next 5 years bet(s), assuming Qlik is not performing any more ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping for the best and preparing for the worst… What do you consider could be your next 5 years bet(s), assuming Qlik is not performing any more ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotiso Hanganu		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotiso Hanganu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 06:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s keep in mind also that investment funds will, most likely, sell Qlik later... which means Oracle or SAP threats are, for the moment, just postponed ! ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s keep in mind also that investment funds will, most likely, sell Qlik later&#8230; which means Oracle or SAP threats are, for the moment, just postponed ! &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Dark		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 02:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38073&quot;&gt;Barry&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Barry,

Many thanks for posting the link to your well researched and thought out article, it certainly makes for interesting reading.

Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38073">Barry</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Barry,</p>
<p>Many thanks for posting the link to your well researched and thought out article, it certainly makes for interesting reading.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Dark		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38075</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 02:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38072&quot;&gt;Martin Mahler&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Martin,

Thank you for your insights.  Certainly sounds like there will be interesting times ahead, and we can expect to see a faster rate of change in the organisation than there has been for a while.

Hopefully if Qlik is reshaped to be more profitable when a re-sale happens it is more likely to be able to continue on in its own path rather than having the technology carved up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38072">Martin Mahler</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Martin,</p>
<p>Thank you for your insights.  Certainly sounds like there will be interesting times ahead, and we can expect to see a faster rate of change in the organisation than there has been for a while.</p>
<p>Hopefully if Qlik is reshaped to be more profitable when a re-sale happens it is more likely to be able to continue on in its own path rather than having the technology carved up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38073</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Steve,

I agree that this will probably as close to situation normal as it could&#039;ve gotten, but still think the company will go through some big changes. Have written down some of my thoughts (and concerns) here: http://www.qlikfix.com/2016/06/03/thoma-bravo-acquires-qlik-3-billion-usd/

Cheers,
Barry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>I agree that this will probably as close to situation normal as it could&#8217;ve gotten, but still think the company will go through some big changes. Have written down some of my thoughts (and concerns) here: <a href="http://www.qlikfix.com/2016/06/03/thoma-bravo-acquires-qlik-3-billion-usd/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.qlikfix.com/2016/06/03/thoma-bravo-acquires-qlik-3-billion-usd/</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Mahler		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Mahler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 23:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Couple of comments from my side:
The share price paid ($30.50) is not really a windfall for shareholders as the stock was priced to market (just two days ago the price was at about $32).
There was no injection of funds into the company itself as it did not issue new shares or debt. Existing shareholders were paid out in cash.

Private Equity firms are usually involved in those deals for one reason only - to make money. Similar to someone buying property to renovate it, PEs take companies private, restructure and sell or go public again. The latter is the case when a company is usually in trouble due to bad management. In Qlik&#039;s case though the numbers seem solid - my only guess is they plan to restructure Qlik and prepare it for a bigger sell-off to a larger vendor in 1-2 years time. What&#039;s positive about it is that Qlik will then likely become more corporate/enterprise friendly and follow a more adaptive rather than visionary strategy to data analytics.

A good thing to follow now would be to see who gets hired/fired at Qlik in the next months...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of comments from my side:<br />
The share price paid ($30.50) is not really a windfall for shareholders as the stock was priced to market (just two days ago the price was at about $32).<br />
There was no injection of funds into the company itself as it did not issue new shares or debt. Existing shareholders were paid out in cash.</p>
<p>Private Equity firms are usually involved in those deals for one reason only &#8211; to make money. Similar to someone buying property to renovate it, PEs take companies private, restructure and sell or go public again. The latter is the case when a company is usually in trouble due to bad management. In Qlik&#8217;s case though the numbers seem solid &#8211; my only guess is they plan to restructure Qlik and prepare it for a bigger sell-off to a larger vendor in 1-2 years time. What&#8217;s positive about it is that Qlik will then likely become more corporate/enterprise friendly and follow a more adaptive rather than visionary strategy to data analytics.</p>
<p>A good thing to follow now would be to see who gets hired/fired at Qlik in the next months&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Dark		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 19:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=2416#comment-38064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38063&quot;&gt;angelmonjaras&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your comment.  My concern is that Qlik may be &#039;encouraged&#039; to put their prices up, or phase out products that smaller businesses rely on - such as QlikView Desktop.  Only time will tell though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlik-acquired-by-thoma-bravo/#comment-38063">angelmonjaras</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.  My concern is that Qlik may be &#8216;encouraged&#8217; to put their prices up, or phase out products that smaller businesses rely on &#8211; such as QlikView Desktop.  Only time will tell though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.quickintelligence.co.uk @ 2026-06-08 19:20:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->