<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Please Release Me &#8211; Or Not?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kristian Wedberg		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-45</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristian Wedberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=469#comment-45</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Major and minor releases are of course (usually optional) vehicles for bringing major and minor buckets of functionality to the customer and the marketplace. Personally I would love to see QlikTech on significantly shorter major release cycles - it would simplify getting new functionality out of the door (bullet graphs or what have you.) 

I have yet to find a client who doesn&#039;t &#039;get&#039; the statement &quot;new big release, might be some bugs initially, consider letting other customers find them&quot;. Most common response is obviously &quot;yes, let&#039;s be a bit conservative&quot;, but sometimes it&#039;s &quot;I NEED XYZ&quot; instead :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major and minor releases are of course (usually optional) vehicles for bringing major and minor buckets of functionality to the customer and the marketplace. Personally I would love to see QlikTech on significantly shorter major release cycles &#8211; it would simplify getting new functionality out of the door (bullet graphs or what have you.) </p>
<p>I have yet to find a client who doesn&#8217;t &#8216;get&#8217; the statement &#8220;new big release, might be some bugs initially, consider letting other customers find them&#8221;. Most common response is obviously &#8220;yes, let&#8217;s be a bit conservative&#8221;, but sometimes it&#8217;s &#8220;I NEED XYZ&#8221; instead :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Luca Fracassi		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-44</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luca Fracassi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=469#comment-44</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very good post...

I agree, especially on the need to improve visualisation and chart options. It&#039;s really becoming urgent...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post&#8230;</p>
<p>I agree, especially on the need to improve visualisation and chart options. It&#8217;s really becoming urgent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Dark		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-43</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=469#comment-43</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Matt - completely agree with regard to the push towards mobile - as evidenced by the Mobile Minutes videos.  This is certainly a box that needs to be ticked - but I don&#039;t see it as one of the more important features of the product.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt &#8211; completely agree with regard to the push towards mobile &#8211; as evidenced by the Mobile Minutes videos.  This is certainly a box that needs to be ticked &#8211; but I don&#8217;t see it as one of the more important features of the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Crowther		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-42</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Crowther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=469#comment-42</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Totally agree Steve.

Yet another example of a tech company falling into the &#039;if Apple do it then so must we&#039; - just because Apple have adopted (in the past) a 12mth release cycle doesn&#039;t mean it fits for everyone. Enterprise software (as Qlikview is fast becoming) moves at a much slower pace; as you say you&#039;re still upgrading sites from v8.5.

I sat in on a WebEx by Chris Furlong covering the new features of v11 - some good points but nothing earth shattering in my mind, but two points concerned me:

1. The un-relenting focus on &#039;Mobile BI&#039;; I don&#039;t doubt it has a place and I generally like the Safari/Android implementation but in v11 for the first time in v11 we saw UI designed for &#039;touch&#039; being used in the desktop version of Qlikview (AJAX &#039;Properties&#039; box if I remember correctly) - thus the desktop version is touch optimized and suffers as a result - why!? I&#039;d love to know the proportion of Qlikview apps that are truly accessed via tablets (my guess would be well under 5%) so why does the other 95% have to suffer for it? Hopefully this won&#039;t be the start of a slippery slope. I was in a room full of Qliktech partners at Qonnections and someone asked out of the 100 or so people present how many had implemented iPhone /iPad for their roster of clients; 2 people put there hand up. (I do expect the Safari Touch implementations to gain traction as they are at least usable.)

2. On the whole the v11 releases are in my mind focused around Enterprise Mgmt - which is un-doubtedly a good thing however this seems to have been at the expense of the UI; which hasn&#039;t been overhauled in years. In the past this hasn&#039;t been an issue; users had a choice; Qlikview or Excel, BO, Cognos and their bland boring ilk, unfortuntatly this isn&#039;t the case anymore. More and more I&#039;m seeing SiB&#039;s where Tableau, Spatial Key and Spotfire are being mentioned by prospects; all of which have a much better out of the box interface and appear to the end user to be easier to use - which used to be one of Qlikview&#039;s USP&#039;s.

Neatly summed up here: http://andpointsbeyond.com/2011/04/01/can-a-humble-chart-object-get-some-love/

It doesn&#039;t matter how fancy or easy to manage the back-end is if the point at which the data consumers actually interact with their data isn&#039;t up to scratch (or no longer comparable to the competition) then they are going to look elsewhere for their BI...mobile or otherwise.

Matt - Visual Analytics Ltd]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree Steve.</p>
<p>Yet another example of a tech company falling into the &#8216;if Apple do it then so must we&#8217; &#8211; just because Apple have adopted (in the past) a 12mth release cycle doesn&#8217;t mean it fits for everyone. Enterprise software (as Qlikview is fast becoming) moves at a much slower pace; as you say you&#8217;re still upgrading sites from v8.5.</p>
<p>I sat in on a WebEx by Chris Furlong covering the new features of v11 &#8211; some good points but nothing earth shattering in my mind, but two points concerned me:</p>
<p>1. The un-relenting focus on &#8216;Mobile BI&#8217;; I don&#8217;t doubt it has a place and I generally like the Safari/Android implementation but in v11 for the first time in v11 we saw UI designed for &#8216;touch&#8217; being used in the desktop version of Qlikview (AJAX &#8216;Properties&#8217; box if I remember correctly) &#8211; thus the desktop version is touch optimized and suffers as a result &#8211; why!? I&#8217;d love to know the proportion of Qlikview apps that are truly accessed via tablets (my guess would be well under 5%) so why does the other 95% have to suffer for it? Hopefully this won&#8217;t be the start of a slippery slope. I was in a room full of Qliktech partners at Qonnections and someone asked out of the 100 or so people present how many had implemented iPhone /iPad for their roster of clients; 2 people put there hand up. (I do expect the Safari Touch implementations to gain traction as they are at least usable.)</p>
<p>2. On the whole the v11 releases are in my mind focused around Enterprise Mgmt &#8211; which is un-doubtedly a good thing however this seems to have been at the expense of the UI; which hasn&#8217;t been overhauled in years. In the past this hasn&#8217;t been an issue; users had a choice; Qlikview or Excel, BO, Cognos and their bland boring ilk, unfortuntatly this isn&#8217;t the case anymore. More and more I&#8217;m seeing SiB&#8217;s where Tableau, Spatial Key and Spotfire are being mentioned by prospects; all of which have a much better out of the box interface and appear to the end user to be easier to use &#8211; which used to be one of Qlikview&#8217;s USP&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Neatly summed up here: <a href="http://andpointsbeyond.com/2011/04/01/can-a-humble-chart-object-get-some-love/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://andpointsbeyond.com/2011/04/01/can-a-humble-chart-object-get-some-love/</a></p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter how fancy or easy to manage the back-end is if the point at which the data consumers actually interact with their data isn&#8217;t up to scratch (or no longer comparable to the competition) then they are going to look elsewhere for their BI&#8230;mobile or otherwise.</p>
<p>Matt &#8211; Visual Analytics Ltd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Dark		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-41</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=469#comment-41</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-40&quot;&gt;Brian S.&lt;/a&gt;.

I personally would go for the upgrade - as there are some great features in 10 (multi-threaded reloads, linked objects and syntax highlighting are very useful), but it may be worth looking at the feature list for 11 to decide if you want to hold off.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-40">Brian S.</a>.</p>
<p>I personally would go for the upgrade &#8211; as there are some great features in 10 (multi-threaded reloads, linked objects and syntax highlighting are very useful), but it may be worth looking at the feature list for 11 to decide if you want to hold off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian S.		</title>
		<link>https://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/qlikview-release-schedules/#comment-40</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickintelligence.co.uk/?p=469#comment-40</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have currently prototyping our upgrade to QV10(from 9) at work and this PR came out for 11. So now what? Do I wait a little longer and upgrade to 11? Or should I stay the course for 10. Upgrading the Publisher/Server piece is a bit of a pain when you have almost 100 live QV Apps out there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have currently prototyping our upgrade to QV10(from 9) at work and this PR came out for 11. So now what? Do I wait a little longer and upgrade to 11? Or should I stay the course for 10. Upgrading the Publisher/Server piece is a bit of a pain when you have almost 100 live QV Apps out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.quickintelligence.co.uk @ 2026-05-13 15:39:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->